Do Christians grow more holy?

Across the swimming, another dispute has arisen and another split taken place, though it has not been much reported beyond narrow interested circles (fortunately). I accept to admit to struggling to chronicle to this kind of debate, then you volition need to look elsewhere for a better reporting of it (if you are interested). But it does raise a primal issue most Christian living.

A few weeks agone, Tullian Tchividjian was asked to remove his blog from The Gospel Coalition (TGC), which was set up by Don Carson and Tim Keller, because of a deviation of theology on the question of sanctification—the question of Christians growing more holy. This is a debate within that conservative evangelical movement known as the New Calvinism, and each of these three are influential figures; Tchividjian is Billy Graham's grandson.

As I understand it, Tchividjian expressed business concern that some Reformed pastors pile on the guilt by telling Christians that they should work hard ('strive') to become more than holy, and this undermines the idea that God saves united states by his grace. By dissimilarity, members of TGC argue that we find exhortations to 'strive' all through the New Testament, so nosotros should continue to do the same at present. Kevin DeYoung'due south response sets this out conspicuously:

There is no plausible style to read the Bible and conclude that God working in us absolves us from working hard, no responsible fashion to recollect that exhortation and exertion are anything other than essential to a life of discipleship.

• 1 Corinthians 15:10 "But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace toward me was not in vain. On the contrary I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me."

• Philippians two:12-13 "Therefore, my honey, as you accept always obeyed, and so now, not but as in my presence only much more in my absenteeism, work out your ain salvation with fright and trembling, for information technology is God who works in you lot, both to will and to work for his practiced pleasure."

• Colossians 1:29 "For this I toil, struggling with all his energy that he powerfully works within me."

• 2 Peter i:5 "For this reason, brand every effort to supplement your faith with virtue, and virtue with noesis…"

The Bible clearly teaches that God works in us so that we might work out.

Into the mix steps Mark Galli, editor of Christianity Today magazine, who laments that, whatever the instruction might be, he really does not see much change in his ain life:

I await at my own life and marvel at the lack of existent transformation after 50 years of try. To be sure, outwardly I'm more than patient, kind, gracious, and then forth. Simply even later one-half a century of transformation, my thoughts and motives are a cauldron of evil. Just one modest example: When a friend fails to show upward on time, I'm outwardly patient and kind, simply inwardly I boxing judgment and condemnation. Before in life, I would accept lashed out at him for being tardy, equally lack of respect for me among other things. Now I have some self-control as I smile and say, "Not a trouble."

As he reflects on this reality, he puts apparent transformation down to a. getting older and b. learning to cover his real motives more than cunningly. In the end, he concludes that the only meaningful transformation happens when Jesus comes once again. This might strike you equally a niggling cynical, and if so yous'd be in good company: Scot McKnight agrees:

If Tullian has a more than optimistic theology of preaching grace Galli has a pessimistic theology.

I think McKnight is perhaps being a little harsh; the one thing that is really commendable virtually Galli's piece is his honesty, and nosotros could always do with more of that. But McKnight points out some of the real problems with this lack of expectation.

The NT I read calls people over and over and over again to a new life in the here and now. Golfers don't expect until the kingdom to ameliorate their game; they piece of work difficult at present and they see comeback — over fourth dimension. Jesus said, "Unless your righteousness [non imputed, just behavioral] greatly surpasses the righteousness of the Pharisees and scribes" — get this — "you will never ever even enter into the kingdom."

The NT I read has Galatians 1-4 (grace theology) and Galatians 5-6 (obedience, fruit, love, alter), and the Paul I meet in the NT is a man transformed, not a man simply waiting the kingdom when the transformation will happen. And the Paul of the NT calls his churches to change, to growth — with his "once yous were" and "simply now", and the history of the church confirms this is how the bulk have read the NT.

What I find most striking almost McKnight's comments is how obvious they are—of grade we should expect transformation. And so what is going on? I went back and re-read some of the above argue, and one thing actually stood out. In Kevin DeYoung'southward piece on grace, transformation, at that place was one thing missing: mention of the Holy Spirit. Actually, at that place was one mention:

Merely as Christ works in u.s.a. by his Spirit through the gospel, we are called to striving and effort.

I think this phrase is very revealing. Information technology does mention the Spirit, just it is Christ who works in the states and information technology is by the gospel (presumably, by right proclamation of the teaching of gospel doctrines) that the Spirit works. This seems to me to reduce the Spirit to a doctrinal label that makes no difference in exercise.—in upshot this Trinity is of 'Father, Son and Holy Scripture.' What a long way from Paul's theology! The same thing can be found in other analyses of the issue. Richard Davis Phillips is also office of TGC, and he offers this analysis:

The heart of the controversy lies in these matters:

ane)Is it possible, even expected, for Christians to pb increasingly holy lives by the power of God's grace in Christ received through faith?

2)Does the Bible, and thus should we, effect commands to obedience and personal godliness that are intended for the laic himself or herself to do, in the power of grace through organized religion in Christ?

Here, then, is the controversy: Tullian has repeatedly written over several years in a mode that suggests that the respond to these questions is No.

How extraordinary to ask or reply either of these questions without explicit mention of the Holy Spirit! This, for me, represents the double weakness of the 'Reformed' calendar every bit it is now: a focus on rational explanations of the gospel, involving terms like 'imputed righteousness'; and a parallel failure to pay attention to key parts of the NT text, in particular, Paul's theology of the Spirit. (Peter Enns suggests there is another problem too.) When I was teaching on Paul in theological college, I asked students to do a search for mentions of the Spirit in Paul'south writings. The answer was: there are likewise many to count! No wonder that Gordon Fee puts the Spirit at the centre of Paul's theology:

Whatever careful reading of Paul's letters makes information technology abundantly clear that the Spirit is the key element, the sine qua non, of all Christian life and experience. To put that in theological perspective, it needs to exist noted that, contrary to historic Protestantism, "justification by faith" is non the central theme of Pauline theology." That is but ane metaphor among many, and therefore much besides narrow a view to capture the many-splendored richness of God's esthatological conservancy that has been effected in Christ. For Paul the theme "salvation in Christ" dominates everything, from showtime to finish. And for him "Salvation in Christ" is the activity of the triune God.

God the Father, the field of study of the saving verbs, has fore~ordained and initiated salvation for his people; God the Son, through his death on the cross, has effected it, thereby achieved for his people adoption, justification, redemption, sanctification, reconciliation, and propitiation, to name the primary metaphors. Just it is God the Spirit who has effectively appropriated God'southward salvation in Christ in the life of the laic and of the believing community. Without the latter, the old just does not happen. (Listening to the Spirit in the Text, p 37)

Remarkable, then, that so many short introductions to Paul's theology do not accept a chapter on the Spirit—the exception being Anthony Thiselton's excellent The Living Paul. When people ask me why I would call myself a charismatic, I answer that it is because I am an evangelical. Important though Marking Galli's honest and realism is, you cannot read the NT without seeing a major expectation that the Spirit will brand his presence strikingly felt in the life of the believer.

If you enjoyed this, practise share it on social media (Facebook or Twitter) using the buttons on the left. Follow me on Twitter @psephizo. Like my page on Facebook.

Much of my work is done on a freelance footing. If you lot have valued this post, you tin can make a single or echo donation through PayPal:

Comments policy: Practiced comments that engage with the content of the mail service, and share in respectful fence, tin can add real value. Seek first to understand, then to exist understood. Make the most charitable construal of the views of others and seek to learn from their perspectives. Don't view debate as a disharmonize to win; address the argument rather than tackling the person.

liningertheming.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.psephizo.com/biblical-studies/do-christians-grow-more-holy/

Share this post